I have done some research into possible fonts I could use on my magazine front cover, for both the masthead, sell lines and for the main copy of the article inside. This has helped give me an idea of the fonts I would like to use and what would look effective or not.
Masthead
I really like this font, as because it is sans serif, it is very simple but is clear to read and would stand out well on the page at is is really rounded and bold. It also looks very professional like many existing magazines I have seen.
The down side of this font is that it is fairly thin and rounded letters so if it is covered a lot by the image it might be too hard to read. It is also quite a standard font for a masthead and I don't want my magazine to just look like every existing magazine which is already available.
I think this font is effective as it is very bold and eye-catching, it is also quite unique and unusual as no existing magazines use a font like this.
I am not as keen on this font as it is quite futuristic and may appeal more to males whereas this doesn't relate to my magazine which is gender neutral.
I really like this font because again it is simple and bold due to the sans serif style, and is a taller shape rather than wide like the font 'Code'. This reminds me of font used on a fashion magazine which looks sophisticated and luxurious.
The negative aspects of this font is that because my magazine name 'Beat' is a short word, the narrow font might not take up very much of the page therefore won't be as eye-catching as it should be.
This is a very similar font to 'Code' however is a bit thicker and less rounded so it would possibly stand out more on the page and look bolder against the main image and other sell lines.
However, this font is quite standard and simple therefore may look a bit boring and less striking as a masthead.
This font is very similar to some others that I have chosen however I think the subtly different shape of the letters is effective as it looks a bit more unusual and unique.
The think I don't like about this is the shape of the letter 'E' as it is not very even and as this letter is featured in my magazine name it will put me off choosing this font.
This is another very similar sans serif font which would look effective as the shape of the letters are distinctive, they are taller which will look neat and professional on the page.
Although it is also a positive aspect, the fact that the letters are tall could also be a negative because my magazine name is only 4 letters long so this might not look very bold and dominant as the masthead.
Sell-Lines
This serif font is appealing to look at because it is so decorative, and would look quite professional to be used for a sell line, enticing the reader to look inside as it gives the impression that the whole magazine will be as appealing to the eye.
On the other hand, some of the letters become very thin at points which may be difficult to distinguish on a front cover against the image.
I like how narrow and unusual this font is, and will contrast quite drastically from the text on the masthead. It is not too old fashioned but also not extremely modern which relates to the main image of my front cover and double page spread so this may be an effective font to use.
This font might be a bit too narrow and tall to stand out on my front cover as it is a serif font again the thin sections of the letters might be drowned out by the image it is anchoring.
I think that this would be a really effective font for a pull quote sell-line as it looks personal and hand written because it is such a decorative, script font. It is also very appealing to the eye.
The downside of this font is that because it is so fancy it might not look as professional, and the joined up writing might be difficult to read if it is a full sentence, it is not as simple as I would like.
I like this font as it is very unusual and vintage looking, and is a bit more cartoon like and eye-catching than the other fonts I have found, it will give my magazine a vintage twist and the thickness of the lettering on the left is striking.
The negative of this font is that it might look too old fashioned and not tie in with my masthead very well, as well as looking less sophisticated because of the cartoony edge to it. It is also quite stereotypical of a vintage look and I would prefer my magazine to be unique and stand out.
I really like this font because it is very simple and professional looking, as well as quite mature and expensive. It is tall and thin so will be clear and very easy to read due to the large spacing between each letter. A sans serif font is definitely easier to read I have found.
As the lettering is so thin this will not look very bold for a front cover, so instead I think I could possibly use this font for the heading of my double page spread where the background is more simple as I will be able to position it away from the main image, and it will not be competing to stand out and catch the eye of a potential buyer.
Although this is a serif font, I really like it because it is appealing to the eye and will be clear to read the text however is not too unusual that it would put someone off reading it - this font will appeal to all types of people as it is not too distinctive.
The downside of this is that as I have said previously a serif font may be less likely to stand out as well against the background image and is not very unique to my individual magazine.
Main Article Copy
This font is modern and attractive, and extremely appealing to the eye. It is quite rounded which looks youthful and simple to look at therefore would be an easy read for the audience.
The problem with this font is that it might be too spaced out to look effective in dense copy, and will look spacious on the page therefore less professional.
This font is much more simple and mature looking, it is professional as it reminds me of the typical font used in existing magazines. This would appeal to any reader as it is not too fussy and is readable at a small font size like it will be in my article.
The only downside of this font is that it is very plain and not as appealing to the eye of the reader, it might also make the text look quite sparse as it is not bold at all.
I really like this font style because it is simplistic and very similar to 'Linux Libertine' however it is better in the sense that is is thicker and bolder, therefore easy to read and looks like the realistic copy found in a double page spread article.
The downside of this font is that it is not very unique and is quite infitting with existing publications whereas I would like my magazine to be a bit different. Hopefully the boldness of this font would not make the writing look too messy and overly dense.
The unusual shape of this font appeals to me as it would to any reader - it is narrower and although it is also a serif font, it is a slightly different style and this could look a bit more unique. It is a very attractive and sophisticated looking font.
The negative aspect of this font is that it may look too tall because of how narrow it is, and this would not look professional or realistic in my article.